After the SNP's leadership election the Nonce Faction retain
BY EDITOR:
Unionists often make the mishap of referring to those who wish to break up the United Kingdom North of the Border as “Scottish Nationalists”, this may have been true at the founding of the Scottish National Party but that platform has long since been usurped by those with rather different politics. Even Sturgeon has said that if she started the SNP today, she would have called it something different. The SNP are Liberal internationalist separatists, hence their advocacy for the EU. They are far more preoccupied with teaching buggery to school children, transvestites' rights and critical race theory than they are in securing Scottish Independence.
"Two things I believe that I think run so strongly through the Scottish independence movement are firstly that it doesn't matter where you come from, if Scotland is your home and you live here and you feel you have a stake in the country, you are Scottish and you have as much say over the future of the country as I do"
Chronicling the SNP's noncery
The SNP is a party of nonces, by nonces and for nonces. That is their primary preoccupation, Scottish separatism is merely a tool by which to secure their primary goal. Such as when the British Government blocked the Gender Recognition Act (AKA the tranny bill) from obtaining Royal Assent under the Scotland Act 1998.
The SNP is a party that has been particularly plagued by a series of sexual scandals, which the party was often keen to turn a blind eye to. Look at Jordan Linden, who was promoted to be the leader of North Lanarkshire Council despite allegations he molested several young men in the past. Look at the case of Patrick Grady MP, who sexually abused a much younger male member of staff, causing him to leave his job. Despite being aware of such allegations for years, the SNP took no action until such allegations were made public. Then there's the case of Mhari Black, an SNP MP who invited a Drag queen called 'FlowJob' to a Primary School in Paisley, who subsequently defended her decision once it made the headlines and decried those who opposed it as 'homophobic'.
And who can forget the case of Derek Mackay, the former finance secretary, a 43- year-old man who made several advances on a teenage boy. The Scottish Government attempted to stop the Scottish Sun from publishing the revelations, questioning the "justification" of intruding into Mackay's private life". He subsequently resigned after the story was published.
This account barely scratches at the surface, as we can see such corruption goes all the way to the top, as Ephesians 6:12 states:
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
What do we expect from the party that brought in a so-called "Doctor" Colin Morrison to the Scottish Education Council to write the government's sex education materials, a man who wrote in his University dissertation the need to quote "break down the barrier between sexuality and childhood" echoing the French postmodernist Michael Foucault who signed a petition to the French parliament calling for the decriminalization of all "consensual" sexual relations between adults and minors below the age of fifteen, the age of consent in France.
In line with this, under the Scottish Nonce Party, Scotland was the first country on earth to embed LGBT education into the school curriculum, as a mandatory requirement for all primary and secondary schools within "all levels of the curriculum from early years to senior phase” and with no exemptions.
Under new LGBT inclusivity guidelines drawn up by the Scottish Government, children as young as four are able to change their name and gender at school without their parents' consent. The guidelines call for teachers to unequivocally accept and endorse the wishes of four-year olds to change their gender, to allow them to use the facilities intended for members of the opposite sex, such as lavatories and changing rooms, to develop gender-neutral uniforms and to conceal such information from the parents of said children.
For all intents and purposes, the SNP has turned Scotland into a one-party state. This can be seen with their ideological capture of the civil service through organisations such as the radical "LGBTQ(STD) charity" Stonewall, an organisation that teaches there is such a thing as "transgender 2-year-olds". It's no surprise to learn then, that the founders of LGBT Scotland (an affiliate group of Stonewall that has also received nearly £400,000 in taxpayers’ cash from the SNP Government and more than £250,000 from councils), including its chief executive James Rennie, were prosecuted as part of a crackdown on Scotland's largest ever paedophile network.
In the last few years, the Scottish Government has paid the "charity" almost half a million pounds of taxpayers' money in exchange for training employees (officials who subsequently became responsible for recruiting scores of senior managers) and for guidance on developing policy. In turn, the permanent secretary of the Scottish Civil Service makes climbing the Stonewall equality index a "priority", which it does by such means as erasing gendered language, for instance it removed the word "mother" from its maternity policy.
The kind of thinking that underlines letting Stonewall infiltrate the government is the same that lends itself to interrogating your children with intrusive questions about sex. Hence the SNP's surveys to children as young as primary 5, quizzing them on matters such as whether or not they have a transgender or nonbinary identity, and surveys for children age 14-15 which ask whether they have engaged in anal sex.
Professor David Paton also went as far to accuse the Scottish Government of "normalising underage sexual activity”.
From the Herald:
At CfE Third and Fourth Level, which covers S1-3, the content suggests teaching young people about the concept of sexual rights. Its explanation of the right to personal autonomy and to be recognised as an individual before the law states: “[Young people] are free to explore their sexuality in safe and pleasurable ways, as long as they do not interfere with someone else’s rights.” Resources aimed at S1-3s also include detailed advice on using condoms, lube and what to do if the condom bursts, rips or slips off during sex.
The SNP is a party of nonces, by nonces and for nonces.
Missed opportunity to change course
With the departure of Nicola Sturgeon as First Minister, the SNP had the opportunity to change course. Especially so, given that a large part of the reason for her resignation was the unpopularity of the Tranny bill which was a central plank of her government’s platform and a red line for the Green Party who give the Scottish Nonce Party its majority in Holyrood.
This chance to change course came in the form of leadership contender Kate Forbes, the former Finance Secretary. In the initial weeks of the campaign, she set of a firestorm in the media and her own party by openly affirming her belief in Christian doctrine on matters of sexuality (though in the timid way possible, with her claiming she would have voted against same sex marriage in 2014 but would protect the law since it has been passed despite her personal objections). Scores of MSP's deserted her campaign before it had even got off the ground, in the face of prolonged mainstream media disparagement. Despite Kate Forbes continued gestures for reconciliation and her insistence that these were merely her personal opinions that would not have any bearing on her politics- almost to a point of grovelling- some of her SNP colleagues would accept no level of dissent.
John Nicholson the SNP MP for Ochil and South Perthshire, called Forbes a "sex obsessed religious fundamentalist". This is the same chap who is Depute Chair of the APPG on Global 'LGBT+ Rights’. This is, of course, total projection on the part of Nicholson. For the leaders of the Nonce faction of the SNP, no dissent on matters relating to sex can be tolerated- at least not for someone at the helm of the party. Because even if they know she won't "rollback existing rights" they know she will not be enthusiastic in the advancement of new so called "rights", i.e., the right for children and adults to sex change on demand, the right to assisted suicide and also in other matters such as banning protests outside baby murder surgeries and so forth.
Despite the fact that polling demonstrated Forbes was consistently favoured by the General Public- against Ash Regan and especially Humza Yousaf- and despite her being viewed as a more competent minister and therefor someone more likely to achieve Scottish independence, she was still the enemy of the party establishment. For much of the top brass of the SNP, Scottish Independence takes a back seat to Liberalism.
Despite the vitriol directed towards Forbes, all the media speculation she was a total write off and her facing the opposition of the vast majority of the SNP parliamentary party she came very close to being voted in as SNP leader by the party membership at 48%- to Humza Yousaf's 52% (after the elimination of the nutjob Ash Regan).
Close... but no cigar. Instead, the members of the supposedly 'nationalist' Scottish Nonce Party voted for Islamic Occupation of Bute House by a Mohammaden called Humza Yousaf. Or as he is otherwise known Humza Useless, given his less than stellar record as government minister. With the Moselm overseeing a surge in A&E waiting times and ambulance response times as health secretary. The only thing he can point to in that position is the avoidance of nurses and doctors strikes, only 'achieved' by total capitulation to the unions.
Unlike any decent Moslem however, such as the brave men of the Taliban, Yousaf is totally pozzed. He was the sole candidate to commit his support to the Tranny bill by pledging to take the UK Government to court over the legality of its use of a section 35 order (a veto). Naturally then he was chosen as the "continuity candidate" by the party establishment, with Yousaf receiving the backing of the outgoing deputy First Minister John Swinney and the Westminster leader Stephen Flynn. With some inside the SNP accusing the party of rigging the rules in Yousaf’s 'favour (the other two candidates themself raised concerns, with both requesting an Audit of votes be done by an outside body).
Given that part of the reason for Sturgeon's resignation was the current police investigation into £600,000 of SNP funds that has went missing, and that up until the 18th of March Nicola Sturgeon's husband was the Chief Executive Officer of the of the SNP before resigning over his attempts to conceal the drastic drop in SNP membership, I don't find this hard to believe. Even more so, given the party's (and by extension the government) conspiracy to put Salmond in prison on trumped up charges of rape, with the Scottish Governments investigation into such allegations (which were prodded on by Senior members of the SNP) ruled by the Court of Session to be tainted by "apparent bias". While we're at it, nor does the malicious prosecution of Rangers administrators which ended up landing the Scottish taxpayers with a bill in excess of £40 million.
The fact is, the SNP (or more specifically the Nonce faction which controls it) behaves like a mob. It is the only political party to explicitly forbid its members from criticising the party leadership with the rulebook stating that "no MPs shall “publicly criticise a group decision, policy or another member of the group".
In line with this, no quarter has been allowed for Kate Forbes and her supporters in the new Scottish cabinet. Forbes herself was offered the role of Rural Affairs secretary, a demotion from her previous role as Chancellor. The only reason the ignominious offer was made was to humiliate a political opponent. Forbes reportedly told him where to shove his offer.